Thread: String Theory
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-01-2005, 22:07
phrontist's Avatar
phrontist phrontist is offline
Proto-Engineer
AKA: Bjorn Westergard
FRC #1418 (Vae Victus)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 828
phrontist has a reputation beyond reputephrontist has a reputation beyond reputephrontist has a reputation beyond reputephrontist has a reputation beyond reputephrontist has a reputation beyond reputephrontist has a reputation beyond reputephrontist has a reputation beyond reputephrontist has a reputation beyond reputephrontist has a reputation beyond reputephrontist has a reputation beyond reputephrontist has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to phrontist
Re: String Theory

String theory is where the lines of physics become blurred. The real debate is whether it can actually be called a "Theory," because we have no way of testing whether it is true. When you can't construct an experiment that would falisify once and for all your theory, it isn't science, or so goes the thinking of Karl Popper. I really wouldn't worry about it, as it isn't likely to play into an engineer's life to often, but if theoretical physics is your game, this is where its at. My physics teacher maintains that "string theorists" are really nothing more than philosophers, which, if you want to be pedantic about it, is true.
__________________

University of Kentucky - Radio Free Lexington

"I would rather have a really big success or a really spectacular crash and failure then live out the warm eventual death of mediocrity" - Dean Kamen
Reply With Quote