View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-01-2005, 13:24
tkwetzel's Avatar
tkwetzel tkwetzel is offline
Good Luck Teams!
AKA: Tyler Wetzel
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,241
tkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to tkwetzel
Re: 2WD diagonal System

Quote:
Originally Posted by gwross
He tried above, but the formatting got messed up. I think I got the idea. See if this helps:
That was the same person who posted the question. I think he was asking about a diamond shape versus a rectangular shape.

I think this (posted by greencactus3) might help:

................CW
............../......\
............/..........\
........../..............\
.......PW..............PW
..........\.............../
............\............/
..............\........./
................CW

If you are looking for something else, please specify what else you want to know. I actually thought about doing something like that, with omni-wheels in the two CW positions perpendicular to the two drive wheels. I also thought about making a square/rectangular robot with one wheel on each side parallel to the side, so it would work like the above design, but still be larger. Than only problem with that would be the weight that is out on each corner, because it wouldn't be supported by all four wheels. I hope this post made sense.
__________________
See you in DC!