Thread: pic: 494 Power Module
View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 17:40
ntroup's Avatar
ntroup ntroup is offline
WildStang!
None #0111 (Wildstang)
Team Role: Engineer
  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Schaumburg
Posts: 52
ntroup has much to be proud ofntroup has much to be proud ofntroup has much to be proud ofntroup has much to be proud ofntroup has much to be proud ofntroup has much to be proud ofntroup has much to be proud ofntroup has much to be proud ofntroup has much to be proud ofntroup has much to be proud of
Re: pic: 494 Power Module
Quote:
Originally Posted by want2modmygt
are they really going to check that closely for the SLU-70 connectors? I dont like them as much as past years connectors. In my opinion, having the wire screw into the terminal is completely negated by the fact that it then has to be shrink-wraped/electrical taped.
I am not sure if they (the inspectors) are going to explicitly look for the SLU-70 connectors or not, but the rules, and the Q&A, seem to dictate pretty clearly that they are required and the only legal form of connector allowed for the 6AWG. I agree that other forms of connectors (as we, ourselves, have used in the past) seem to be better suited for the situation.

I view this as a similar situation to the Anderson Connector discussion....
Reply With Quote