Thread: Designing arms against buckling
View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-02-2005, 11:58
Paul Copioli's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero Woodie Flowers Award
Paul Copioli Paul Copioli is offline
President, VEX Robotics, Inc.
FRC #3310 (Black Hawk Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 1,385
Paul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Designing arms against buckling
Rick,

I knew it started with a T, but I always screw the name up (the video will NEVER leave my memory).

Every part of my message dealt with buckling, except the last sentence which mentioned dynamic conditions. I should have elaborated on what I meant by dynamic conditions, but I wanted to keep my message short. The point I was trying to make was that when dealing with buckling, mass is not a contributor to the critical load. However, when dealing with dynamic conditions (aka natural frequency, resonant frequency, etc.), mass is a big player. After re-reading the message, I can see how someone would make the buckling connection to the last sent ace. I apologize for the confusion.

-Paul