View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-02-2005, 22:14
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,685
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: FPs Gone Exothermic

The rest of the answer would be to run the FPs with a speed controller. Speed controllers send 12V pulses to the motor, and through software, you control how long the pulse is on vs. how long it's off. As I recall, 128 or 127 is software is zero duty cycle, or off. 255 or 0 is full on in one direction or another. Soo... in programming, if you limit yourself to a range of 64-192 it's similar to limiting the voltage of the motor to 6V. It's not exactly the same, and the motor will be slower and less powerful and more likely to stall.... but if it does stall, you're only pulsing 12V to it 50% of the time, so it's less likely to overheat.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter