View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-02-2005, 12:43
tribotec_ca88's Avatar
tribotec_ca88 tribotec_ca88 is offline
FIRST-a-holic
AKA: Camila Fitzgibbon
FRC #1382 (Tribotec Team)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: São José dos Campos, Brazil
Posts: 194
tribotec_ca88 is just really nicetribotec_ca88 is just really nicetribotec_ca88 is just really nicetribotec_ca88 is just really nicetribotec_ca88 is just really nice
Send a message via ICQ to tribotec_ca88 Send a message via MSN to tribotec_ca88 Send a message via Yahoo to tribotec_ca88
Lightbulb FRC...autonomous or driver-controlled competition?

I got this topic idea from this thread: ("Capping Vision Tetras")
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=35033

Some of the messages from that thread really made me think about this whole "autonomous period vs. remote controlled period" thing. The debate going through my head right now is: should FIRST be giving more emphasis to the autonomous period (and extend it for more than 15 seconds?) or should it be leaning toward the remote-controlled aspect of the competition? I personally am still confused about this...I think the game still seems to be slightly unbalanced between the two. Even though I am in favor of extending the autonomous mode time, I can imagine that this would be an uninteresting move to make when we consider all of these teams that have no programmers...is that what we want? To leave them in disadvantage? Or to inspire students to expand their knowledge in autonomous programming? Well... what is FIRST's objective, exactly? To turn FRC into a battle-bot game or an "AI" sort of contest?

What do you think?
__________________
1382 Tribotec Team - Brazil
-----------------------------------------------
2005 NJ Regional GM Industrial Design Award
2005 NJ Regional Website Excellence Award
2004 NJ Regional Semifinalists
-----------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote