View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-02-2005, 22:37
Dranyam Dranyam is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 27
Dranyam has a spectacular aura aboutDranyam has a spectacular aura about
Re: 2005 FRC Team Update 14

The problem i have with the rule is the absolute heavy-handed arbitration with which the rule was administered. It was as if they recognized a gray area in the rules, and instead of it being decided on a case-by-case basis by the refs, which would have its own set of inconsistencies, they quickly released a rule, AFTER ship, that has very different implications for different sized robots.

Edit: I didn't realize it had to be part of the drivetrain/chassis. This makes my point even stronger.

Personally, I think it would've been much more appropriate to simply leave the situation to the refs to decide. This rule is... poorly planned.

Last edited by Dranyam : 26-02-2005 at 22:44.
Reply With Quote