View Single Post
  #94   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-02-2005, 02:06
jgannon's Avatar
jgannon jgannon is offline
I ᐸ3 Robots
AKA: Joey Gannon
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,467
jgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond reputejgannon has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Zones

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJunx
These are just some thoughts I had about the loading zone, tomorrow I will post an idea for interpreting the original and enforcing the rule at competitions, called the Sunlight Rule.

Not to be lawyerly, but I think we can all agree that a "zone" can is accurately defined as "An area or a region distinguished from adjacent parts by a distinctive feature or characteristic." In this case, the distinctive feature is the HDPE triangle.

Also, I think we can agree that there are all sorts of zones. An end zone (as in football), an elevator, and a house all qualify as a zone, as they are each regions that are distinguished from adjacent areas by lines, walls, etc.

Now, in examining zones, we can see that being "in" a zone takes on different meanings depending upon the type of zone:
-To be "in" an end zone in football, you must be touching the ground within the end zone (there are one or two exceptions, but they don't seem particularly relevant).
-To be "in" an elevator, we can all agree that you need not be touching the elevator at all. So long as you are contained within the elevator, you are "in" the elevator.
-To be "in" a house is analogous to being in the elevator.

Which type of zone does the loading zone most closely resemble? --I realize there might be other types of zones, but it is 1:45 and I can't think of any more--

The loading zone is NOT an enclosed, 3-D space. Therefore, based on analogy alone , in order to be "in" the loading zone, it makes sense that one must be touching the zone in the same way that one must touch the end zone in football.

I offer these statements just as thoughts.

-Andrew
Actually, in football, you need only break the plane of the goal line with the ball to be considered "in" the end zone. Thus, all three definitions of "zone" seem to imply three-dimensional space, contrary to the loading zone definition. I now have a better understanding of why people are so darn confused.

<edit>
Someone just PMed me an explanation of how an endzone can also be 2D. When a receiver catches the ball in the corner of the end zone, his feet have to touch the ground in-bounds. No touch? Doesn't count. Makes sense to me. *shrug*
</edit>
__________________
Team 1743 - The Short Circuits
2010 Pittsburgh Excellence in Design & Team Spirit Awards
2009 Pittsburgh Regional Champions (thanks to 222 and 1218)
2007 Pittsburgh Website Award
2006 Pittsburgh Regional Champions (thanks to 395 and 1038)
2006 Pittsburgh Rookie Inspiration & Highest Rookie Seed

Team 1388 - Eagle Robotics
2005 Sacramento Engineering Inspiration
2004 Curie Division Champions (thanks to 1038 and 175)
2004 Sacramento Rookie All-Star

_

Last edited by jgannon : 27-02-2005 at 05:16.