[Jon K.]

Originally Posted by Alex469

I'll bite and throw it back: this is inaccurate in my opinion. Assuming that the teams listed on that page are the current competitors, the Juggernauts should be in the Galileo division. The template for divisions is: Archimedes, Curie, Newton, Galileo- this has been in use since 2003. The teams are basically listed numerically and sorted by that template. (1st, 5th, 9th, and so on are in the first division; 2nd, 6th, .. in the second division; and so on) The division that start the list rotates each year. The first team numerically in both 2003 and 2004 was the Juggernauts (0001). In 03 they we placed in Curie, and last year they participated in Newton. Following the template, they should be placed in Galileo this year. Thats my $.02 analysis of the championship sorting system. Attached is my current unofficial division listing- I've been updating it since 3 months ago just to see how my team moves around as teams join in and drop out. However, through the power of coincidence, 469 has ended up in Galileo- what I expected based on my sheet.

_Alex

ÐÏࡱá>þÿ 
? ........... ÀFþÿÿÿWorkbook
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ2[SummaryInformation(

ÿÿÿÿ.DocumentSummaryInfo rmation8
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ6

Anyone else get this when trying to open the attatchment? And does anyone know how to correct this?