|
Re: [moderated]: A call for an end to inconsistency (sticking up for G25)
So far as I have read this thread when most people are talking about the G25 they inquire the tipping of a robot and intentional damage. During that match 71 was not tipped over nor was there any extensive damage(correct me on that if i'm wrong). I agree there was a lot pushing between the two teams but neither one actually fell over. I felt inconsistancy was a big problem. If 'Agressive Defense' was the case why wasn't it applied in the round before? On a smiliar subject I didn't exactly understand that after the second match during the finals why it was announced that 'A robot should have been disabled so we are going to replay the match.' There was no mention of which team commited the foul nor specifically what they did. I've seen at IRI Andy Baker, has gone over to the microphone when the crowd disagreed with the refs and explained himself .
__________________
2nd Place in CURIE
Top 20 in the Nation
Everyone should Try HOOKAH!
|