Quote:
|
Originally Posted by M.O.R.T.
Well not to toot our own horn, but I'm going to take Ed's advice and tell you why 11 deserves to win.
...
So that's just a piece of why I feel 11 should win, but with such competition like 111, 233, 365, 79, 48, 341, 694, 60, 342, 236...just to name a few it's going to be a nailbiter to the end.
|
This is the first anybody has actually given a reason why they should win the award. Good for you. I can throw out plenty of numbers and say they should win the award but the question is, WHY? Just saying that they run a great organization tells us nothing. it's all in the details. Tell me why 341 should win over 60, or 11 over 79. Please turn this tread into a toot your own horn thread, we can all learn and grow from all of the Chairman's award winners. It's not like you're saying that your robot is the best, you're giving all teams a blueprint for how to run a better organization.
Going back to Ed's point of breaking the 200 barrier, has anybody else noticed the number of 300 level teams winning at the regional level this year? 0-299 have 10 winners, 400+ have 12 winners, and the 300 level teams alone have 8. That's pretty good representation for the Rookie class of 2000.