Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik
This seems inconsistent to me. The original poster possibly has misconceptions about said team, and should be corrected. It's not something to get defensive and upset about if one is said to have an engineer-bot, right?
|
The defensive response is because the original poster and some follow-ups implied that such teams are somehow cheating their students out of an opportunity, by asking questions like "What is the point of robotics if adults are the ones designing, engineering, building, and servicing the robot?"
The fact that these conclusions are reached on false information (that the robots in question actually are not 100% adult built) is simply salt in the wound.