Thread: How do you think FIRST should select divisions?
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-04-2005, 07:27
xzvrw2's Avatar
xzvrw2 xzvrw2 is offline
Its been a long time.
AKA: Stevie Alvarado
FRC #0065 (The Huskie Brigade)
Team Role: Alumni
  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Pontiac, Michigan
Posts: 1,170
xzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to xzvrw2
Re: How do you think FIRST should select divisions?
see the problem i have with this..the only problem..is that like us.....we were 31st ranked but got picked and lost in the finals. it only goes on rank. i think that it should also go on if your robot got picked and how far you went. rank doesn't always tell how well your robot did. your robot could have been really good but some if your partners weren't all that great so you lost all but 2 matches. teams would still look at you and see if you did well in those matches. so only going by rank is not accurate.
__________________
my FIRST acomplishments: 2003:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, Archimedes Division winner, National Champion (w/ 111 and 469) 2004:MWR Finalist 2005:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, MWR Innovation in Controls award 2006:hmmm wow, umm we got picked 4th overall at Nats by 121
my FIRST resume: 65 (2003-2006)