|
Re: Alliance picking
Our team didn't go to Pittsburgh, but some of us went to watch. In the final, the lower-seeded team won because they had a better strategy; they had a little rookie bot pulled from the stand-by pool block team 365 (MOE), the best bot on the field in that match if you ask me, and definately the best capper. MOE didn't score as much, so the lower-seeded alliance won.
The point is, even the best bot in the world can be brought down by a well-thought-out strategy and a little determination. Teams on lower-seeded alliances can win. Why should the higher-ranked teams have to submit to letting the playing field be levelled to such a degree that it's not really a fair competition anymore?
People have already made the point that FIRST is entirely different from professional sports, so I don't think I need to say anything about that.
EDIT: I forgot to mention team 53. They were ranked 53rd after the Qualifying Matches, and they wound up on the 1st seeded(and winning) alliance(congrats, guys!).
__________________
Proud alum of FRC Team 1629 and mentor of FRC Team 639
Cornell Engineering class of 2012!!
Last edited by StephLee : 10-04-2005 at 14:29.
|