|
Re: Alliance picking
I have been pondering this question ever since i began reffing. It seems all to common to see the #1 seed pick #2 and go on to dominate the compeition. At RiverRage Ed Forcier asked me if we should try the #2 option in the poll. It was great, eliminated landslides and made for an extremely even matchup through the finals. The football analogy is a great example...why should the best team get the best partners? If a team is so "good" they shouldnt need the number 2 seed to prove themselves. Hence why I voted that we should pick out of the top 8.
also on another note...i've noticed most people who support the current setup are people who have benefieted from it. I myself am a product of getting screwed by being stuck against the best alliance.
just my $.02 and observations
|