Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jones571
I of course will disagree upon the fact that I'm not violating any rules this is a draft pick for draft pick. or robot for robot. that is how the trade rules were set up if he wants to set him self back like this so be it but there are honestly no real grounds for a veto...please enlighten me.....
|
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...75&postcount=4
How about the clause that says no uneven trades. That's the grounds.