I have not read anywhere in the rules that a mechanism can be a part. Many parts make up a mechanism. If it were the intent of the game committee to allow mechanisms to be rebuilt or made or upgraded, why did they not use the words mechanism or assembly. FIRST has asked us to be less lawyers yet when they say something day one and then change the words and meaning 10 weeks later it makes me wonder why we listen in the first place. This is not the time or place to continue this type of discussion though.
I personally like YMTC because I get to debate. I love the challenge of presenting the other side of the discussion. I love the fact that it makes me think which is something I don't always do (check some of my posts). Please continue with YMTC. I know that Dave loves to be challenged also.
