View Single Post
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-04-2005, 23:54
Goldeye Goldeye is offline
Registered User
AKA: Josh Hecht
FRC #0694 (Stuypulse)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 145
Goldeye has a spectacular aura aboutGoldeye has a spectacular aura aboutGoldeye has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to Goldeye
Re: 3 Teams Per Side Too Many?

Triple Play would be impossible with only two teams. In some cases, a game will be too simple if made for a 2v2. Triple Play was probably a pretty decent median. Their wasn't really crowding on the field, and although there was a lot of action making it hard to follow each action in the game, the fact that there's only two teams made it easy to tell the current game status in a few glances.

The best answer is variety. If they can make a game where two robots are needed to accomplish a difficult task on a very large field, even 4v4 could be reasonable (with serpentine alliance picking). I'm sure they can make a great 2v2v2 game too. Whatever they come up with, I'm sure it'll be good.
__________________
Team 694

2005 Championship - Galileo Semifinalist
2005 New York - Regional Chairmans Award
2005 New York - Semifinalist (Thanks 1257,1340)