Quote:
|
Originally Posted by xzvrw2
So what you are saying is that if a robot is to be DQ'd then they should not be diabled? If that is the case then in our match with team 494 and team 20 against 245 and their alliance, our robot should not have been disabled (we accidentaly tiped over a robot while we were trying to get to the autoloader)? And if that is what you are saying, then a robot that has a habit of tipping other robots, wether on purpose or accident, should be allowed to keep doing that for the rest of the match?
|
If they tip another bot, it is clear that the tip was intentional, and a tip is definately a hazard to damaging the other robot. Disabiling and DQing can both occur simultaneously, but not always. Some offenses warrant disabiling for safety reasons (tetras over player stations) but would not warrant a DQ. And vice versa. But in some situations, if the offense was both obviously intentional, and dangerous, it would warrant both a disabiling(for the safety of the people and robots) and a DQ (for a grevious, intentional rules violation).