|
Re: Toughest Regional Metrics...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Joe Johnson
Those of you who attended the Great Lakes Regional and the Western Michigan Regional, know that Dave Verbrugge -- MC without peer -- pulled together a metric that he used to demonstrate (at least to the folks listening to him live) that the GLR was the toughest regional and the WMR was the toughest "pound for pound."
His metric was essentially this: Take all the number of teams that were finalist or winners of the divisions in Atlanta and see which regional had the most number of teams in that group of 24.
If you do that this year, this is what you get:
Looks good for WMR. With SAC, GLR and Detroit right behind.
But what if you take the WINNERS of the divisions:
Sacramento is looking pretty tough.
But you can go with the FINALIST AND CHAMPIONS only
Again, Sacramento is looking pretty tough.
But WAIT, THERE'S MORE! What about the CHAMPIONS ONLY:
Bottom line: Define your metric and you can get just about any result you want.
So... ...what is your metric? Define a metric and argue that this or that regional is the biggest and baddest going on.
Joe J.
|
Wow!
I could have sworn that Robbe Extreme (56) Championship Finalists were winners at Philadelphia. They sure fooled me accepting that trophy there!
__________________
Three Signs You Are Getting Old: 1) You forget things, 2) You begin repeating yourself, 3) You forget things.
|