Thread: FIRST Wish List
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 15:29
xzvrw2's Avatar
xzvrw2 xzvrw2 is offline
Its been a long time.
AKA: Stevie Alvarado
FRC #0065 (The Huskie Brigade)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Pontiac, Michigan
Posts: 1,170
xzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to xzvrw2
Re: FIRST Wish List

Ok in reading the posts about the elim rounds I have came up with an idea that I want people to comment on.

At nationals the four divisions; Archimedes, Newton, Galileo, and Curie; are broken up into eight divisions. And in each of those divisions, every team in it, plays with and against every team in that division. So lets say 65, 217, 71, 233, 67, 111, 469, 330, 254, 229, 64, and 66 are all in one division on the Archimedes field, (hey a kid can dream can't he) then they all play with and against each other: 65, 66, 67 against 217, 71, 111 is one match and 233, 330, 469 against 254, 64, 229. Then the next two matches would be 65, 217, 71 against 469, 229, 66 and 111, 330, 64 against 67, 233, 254 and so on. And then after they all played with and against each other the top seed would pick two other teams to be in the alliance. Then the elims would be the number one seeds and their alliances of each division, they would all play each other for the Arch, Newton, Galileo, or Curie division, depending on which division they are in. Then the winners of the four big divisions would play on Einstein field just like regular.



Those are my thoughts, please comment.
__________________
my FIRST acomplishments: 2003:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, Archimedes Division winner, National Champion (w/ 111 and 469) 2004:MWR Finalist 2005:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, MWR Innovation in Controls award 2006:hmmm wow, umm we got picked 4th overall at Nats by 121
my FIRST resume: 65 (2003-2006)