View Single Post
  #73   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 23:10
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,827
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Should FIRST address "ramp bots"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkJedi613
Overall it must be handled in a case by case situation, no two situations in a FIRST match are going to be the same - the rules need to be written to guide the inspectors and referees who are the ones who must make the final decision.
Sample "guide" rule: If a robot drives up a wedge or other traction-reducing device and tips over, flips, or otherwise becomes inoperable, that is not the fault of the robot with said wedge. If, on the other hand, the robot with said wedge or traction-reducing device drives into the other robot, and the other robot becomes inoperable, that is (a penalty--FIRST's decision what) on the robot with the wedge. If both robots are judged at fault, that is a referee's call as to who gets penalized or not."

OK, it's a bit legalistic and all that, but it gets the point across (I hope) as to who is at fault in a general sense.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk