Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KenWittlief
I dont agree - originally the republicans said "if you are going to break 230 years of tradition and block the presidents qualified and commitee approved judges by refusing to table the debate indefinately and allow a simple majority vote (as the constitution requires), then we have enough votes to make it clear that fillabusting appointments is not acceptable"
Nuclear in the sense that the democrats would not be able to stop the clarification of fillabuster rules.
But the democrates and the press have jumped on the term, and threatened a federal government shutdown (meltdown)
which would have been an act of desperation, and would have caused a huge backlash against the democrats in the senate.
Its only became 'politically explosive' because the democrats have threatened to 'take their ball and go home' so nobody can play, if they dont get their way.
the minority parrty in the senate does not have the right to dictate the religious beliefs or moral values of the judges appointed by the president. These appointees are fully qualified.
|
Unfortunately, the lack of punctuation in this entry completely overshadows any point you may have hidden in there, Ken.
PS: It's FILLIBUSTER.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cory
The backlash would be enormous, and while I like to make fun of them, I have to think that at least some of them are smart enough to know that in a relatively short amount of time, they will be in the position of the democrats and need the filibuster themselves.
|
I agree completely.