Thread: Michael Jackson
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-06-2005, 22:37
jonathan lall's Avatar
jonathan lall jonathan lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #2505 (The Electric Sheep; FRC #0188 alumnus)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 547
jonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to jonathan lall
Re: Michael Jackson

I haven't really been following this, although it is mildly entertaining at Michael's expense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdr1122334455
But I'm suprised they didn't have an additional count of serving Alcohol to a Minor, that he almost definetly would be convicted of, but he can probably pay his way in fines out of that one.
These are covered in counts 7-10. But I can just hear it now: "Jesus Juice all around, kids. We're celebrating!" I kid, of course.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xzvrw2
There already was. Before this trial. Mike won.
No there wasn't. And no he didn't. A seperate civil suit was filed on the same grounds in 1993 by a different accuser. Michael settled out of court for an undisclosed amount (believed to be about $25 million). Mr. Jackson's attorney pointed out that this particular accuser (would calling him the flavour of the week be appropriate?) has until the age of 18 "before the clock starts ticking on a civil suit." So I'm inclined to think it's a distinct possibility. It all depends on if that family can take even more shame I'd say.
__________________

Reply With Quote