Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gdeaver
Would be interesting if they duplicated the IFI effort and it was approved for competition.
|
I don't see a reason why it has to be approved for competition. I thought IFI's stance always was if you modify the code and introduce a bug it's your problem, not theirs.
IFI put a built in safety mechanism. If your "user processor program" doesn't play nicely and behave the way the "master processor's program" wants you to it will shut off the outputs making your robot dead in the water.