View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2005, 04:01
Elgin Clock's Avatar
Elgin Clock Elgin Clock is offline
updates this status less than FB!
AKA: the one who "will break into your thoughts..."
FRC #0237 (Black Magic)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: H20-Town, Connecticut
Posts: 7,773
Elgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Elgin Clock
Re: COOPETITION? Is it without an inflected[verb] form?! YOU DECIDE!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kims Robot
I could be wrong, but I always thought it was CoopeRtition... coming from the verb cooperate.

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=37612
And you would be correct.. The name comes from the 2000 game called "Co-Opertition FIRST" and the name in my opinion was more of a hint of things to come in the 2001 game "Diabolical Dynamics". It also ushered in an era of ((n) x (your oponents score)) - in 2000's case, 3 times your opponents score - being your qualification so as not to kill the other alliance in points in a match - playing fair and fun rather than beating someone senslessly and scoring say 100 to 0 in a match makes more of an exiting game..

Co-Opertition itself was a take on not only cooperation, but competition, and some say that the 2001 game was the most horrible game ever in the history of FIRST cause there was actually.. no competition since everyone was on the same team during a match..

(But let's not get into that right now)
__________________
The influence of many leads to the individuality of one. - E.C.C. (That's me!!)


Last edited by Elgin Clock : 22-08-2005 at 04:04.
Reply With Quote