View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-09-2005, 12:56
Nikhil Bajaj Nikhil Bajaj is offline
MATLAB Fan
FRC #0461 (Westside Boiler Invasion)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 101
Nikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond reputeNikhil Bajaj has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nikhil Bajaj
Re: pic: Two Motor, 4WD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristan Lall
Are you sure about the 0.25" thickness for the gears?

And as for 15 vs. 20 teeth, 15 just makes things worse! (Higher stresses on the pinion, and depending on the pressure angle of the gear, the potential for some significantly undercut teeth.)
I'm going to second the .375 suggestion--that'll definitely be safe...even our 12 tooth, 20 pitch, .375 gears on our gearbox that used 2 chips and a fish was fine...then again the small gears were early to middle stages in the gearbox so the torque was not so high. But I think .375 should be fine. And if you do go with the wider gears then it may make it easier for you to work out the spacing for the gearbox.

By the way, how are the plates with the bearings and such mounted to the other section? For gearboxes, precise and accurate alignment is absolutely critical. A few thousandths of an inch of misalignment can have a horrendous effect on efficiency. You may want to figure out a way to keep it spaced well...we picked a silly design last year and we ended up having to remake the spacing blocks like three times, and even after that had to use a shim or two.

Last edited by Nikhil Bajaj : 13-09-2005 at 12:59.
Reply With Quote