View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-09-2005, 12:09
jdiwnab's Avatar
jdiwnab jdiwnab is offline
Really the Inventor Guy
AKA: Bryan Hartley
FRC #0617
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Highland Springs, VA
Posts: 260
jdiwnab is a jewel in the roughjdiwnab is a jewel in the roughjdiwnab is a jewel in the rough
Re: Building fully flexible tail (several joints) with minimal actuation required

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz
Bryan,
Not really. The wires were attached at each joint with a pulley system so that there was no need for wires "out in the air". When you pull back on the wire which is attached to the tip, it pulls on the tip until the joint runs out of mechanical play (hits a premade mechanical stop.) Then the next joint flexes until the same thing happens. You don't get the exact motion of a true muscle structure since you are only really using one "muscle" but the approximation is pretty good. Similar mechanics were used in the original "Jaws" but had fewer joints and needs far more power.
I would think that attaching it to every joint would limit the movement and the amount of curve becuase you would start fighting youself, especially if you what it to curve back like in sanddrag's picture. But I might have a serious misunderstanding of what I'm talking about. It makes sence in my own head.
__________________
Proof that Macs will win the platform war: How did Scotty know how to use MacDraft in Star Trek IV?
// random()
I have 100 gmail invites. PM me if you want one.
If they want us to think outside of the box, why do they make us fit in a 38x28x60 inch box?
Beware of Geeks bearing GIFs
Help me test my server software