View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-09-2005, 20:56
dlavery's Avatar
dlavery dlavery is offline
Curmudgeon
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 3,176
dlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 190 in the October Servo Magazine

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
The part about "Get your motors built, get them on the robot" on the first page seems highly illegal to me. Especially the retiming part.
That is correct. This is a clear violation of <R31>.
Quote:
<R31> So that every robot's maximum power level is the same, the motors in the kit may not be modified except as follows:
-It is acceptable to modify the mounting brackets and/or other structural parts of the motors (output shaft, housing, etc.) as long as the electrical system is not modified and the integral mechanical system of the moving parts (bearings, bushings, worm gear output stages, etc.) is not changed or removed.
-The gearboxes for the Fisher-Price, and Globe motors are not considered "integral" and may be separated from the motors. FIRST will not provide replacements for parts that fail due to modification.
The intent is to allow teams to modify mounting tabs and the like, not to gain a weight reduction by potentially compromising the structural integrity of any motor.
Retiming of the motors is clearly a no-no (modifications of the electrical system are specifically prohibited). Turning down the case is clearly against the rules (the exact intent of the rule is even spelled out - and it is made clear that this practice is against the rule). Drilling holes in the case and adding fans to alter the airflow is a not a legal performance enhancement to the motors (it is not one of the permitted modifications to the motors).

-dave

[edit: yeah, Cory just saw the same rule]
__________________
"I know what you're thinking, punk," hissed Wordy Harry to his new editor, "you're thinking, 'Did he use six superfluous adjectives or only five?' - and to tell the truth, I forgot myself in all this excitement; but being as this is English, the most powerful language in the world, whose subtle nuances will blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel loquacious?' - well do you, punk?"
- Stuart Vasepuru, 2006 Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest



My OTHER CAR is still on Mars!!!

Last edited by dlavery : 30-09-2005 at 20:59.
Reply With Quote