Quote:
|
Originally Posted by phrontist
I meant (and said) inverse, not reciprocal. This isn't an assignment, just something that occured to me during my endless and tedious BC Caluclus (anyone else have Early Transcendentals?) homework.
I've been trying to approach the problem visually, the inverse of a function being that function "mirrored" about the line y=x. I think perhaps this is needlessly painful, I'm going to try some algerbraic manipulation of the definition of the derivative...
My guess is that no such function exists, but I wonder if there is an elegant proof of that.
|
The following fact will lead you in the right direction.
Let f be a function that is differentialable on an interval I. Suppose that f has a defined inverse function, called g.
Using the defintion of an inverse, and the chain rule, it can be shown that
g'(x) = 1/f'(g(x)), where f'(g(x)) != 0
This should help with you algebraic manipulation.