View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-10-2005, 19:48
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,785
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Bottiglieri
A box on wheel with amazing drivers will always beat an overly complex and hard to control robot with inexperienced drivers.

Therefore, I think eliminating the ship date would be benneficial. It would turn the build into a more casual time period, cutting out about 2-3 weeks worth of stress. I also like playing by the honor code, with something to the extent of a "tools down day" This would require the teams to have the same build deadline, as well as give many teams who fill the entire 6 weeks with building some time to program and practice.

Can you say working autonmous modes?!
I think it's wishful thinking to assume that teams would relax. I think this might happen with the teams I mentioned earlier that don't manage time well, but all the well off teams are going to keep at it with the same intensity that they would during a six week build.

I like the idea of having a tools down date, but I doubt that teams will follow it out of the goodness of their hearts. Plenty of teams would keep working.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
Reply With Quote