Thread: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion
View Single Post
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-10-2005, 10:11
Jack Jones Jack Jones is offline
Retired
no team
  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 964
Jack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond repute
Re: If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion
One last word - then I'll say no more about it...

I'm not talking about shafting anybody. I'm talking about the 200 to 300 teams that appear to have gone missing this year, and the ones who have registered, but have no idea what will happen come 9 - December. The ultimate competitive disadvantage is not being able to afford to compete in the first place.

It's been stated here that we can trust GP to keep it fair by putting down the tools on ship day, and promising to not make major overhauls in between competitions. I think that would work. On the other hand, it is my opinion that if we don't cut the cost, then the ones who are lucky enough to find and keep major sponsors will soon find it more and more lonely at the top.
Reply With Quote