Thread: The Radio
View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-11-2005, 08:21
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,770
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Radio

As to the background noise issue raised by Amanda, this is actually a known phenom. When you investigate the possibility of any auditory or visual oddity you must consider that we are animals afterall, and only a few milliseconds away from the wild in which we developed. (evolutionary time) Our brains are still intent on listening for things in the forest that can kill us. As such background noise is a sound that we know won't kill us and it leaves our brains to concentrate on other things. Now on to the next issue, intelligibility. Our understanding of the spoken (or sung) word is dependent on a few things. One, a specific signal to noise ratio and two, knowing the words that are being said. We require at least a 45 dB S/N to understand any conversation but if we know that the speaker is confined to a very limited vocabulary, then we can stand about 25 dB S/N. That being said, you can only listen to Cream's "At the Crossroads" at an elevated level, just because it is the only way.

I will leave "feeling the music" for another discussion.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
Reply With Quote