Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Validius
Why a camera crew? Why not just have a cieling cam or 2? I'm not talking about debating somthing small, i'm talking about getting ramed in the loading dock. The officials could easily take a look at the footage while the field is being set up.
Perhaps a system like in the NFL. If a team requests instant replay and no decisions are changed they loose 10 points. My dad's 1992 Hi8 cam caught this incidant, you dont need and kinda fancy hardware.
|
I think you've underestimated the amount of equipment you need for instant replay.
You need a sufficient number of cameras to capture all relevant angles of the playing field.
If those cameras are stationary, that's extra cash that has to be found. If they're the same ones that are currently being used, the operators need intensive training as to what they should be filming and when. In the NFL, do you ever see the cameramen filming some offensive lineman that got clocked by the defense and is lying on the ground seeing stars?
The answer is no. In FIRST, the camera men
LOVE to film robots that have been flipped and are sitting there spinning their wheels in the air. This would not work.
You need to record the match, and have a station setup where a/the refs can watch it. More cash needed.
A lot of regionals can barely afford what they're putting out on the field already. This would be a large burden.
The refs get more calls right than they do wrong. Far more calls right than wrong. We need to just trust them and stand by their decisions, right or wrong.
A
FAR better use of resources would be to make sure that every ref has intensive training, and understand the rulebook, as well as the in match applications of it perfectly.