View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-11-2005, 20:29
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
On to my 16th year in FRC
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 8,493
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Concept Gearbox

I think the Dewalts are the easiest, cheapest, smallest, and lightest way to get that much reduction (I presume you're going for the 12:1 ratio).

However, here are some things I would change if it were my design:

-Reduce the size of those gears and their hubs a considerable amount.
-Move the motors closer together and push that gear out from being inline. You'd end up with a triangle shape of sort with the center of each gear being a vertex of the triangle. (does anyone get this or did I make it too confusing? Sorry I can't describe it well)
- Find a better way to mount the motors and planetary combos. I think the current method isn't going to cut it. I think in the NBD setup, there is a plate between the CIM and DW tranny. I would modify this plate to look something like the ones in the KOP and mount the CIMS that way.
-How thick are the gearbox plates? I'd say anything over 1/4" is overkill.

PS. I would stick with the two dewalts; I think 2 CIMS into one would fail after a while.

Anyway, looks good and keep up the great work!
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004

Last edited by sanddrag : 16-11-2005 at 20:31.
Reply With Quote