View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-11-2005, 21:23
Tom Bottiglieri Tom Bottiglieri is offline
Registered User
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,183
Tom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Concept Gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
Don't get me wrong. I'm a proud member of the small but mighty "'I think FRC has gotten too easy' Club" but this does bring up the point (which hypocritically I have combated in other threads) that why put yourself through more work if you don't have to? Why go through the trouble if an off-the-shelf solution will fulfill your needs.

To make your own planetary is a tricky business. Finding ring gears with the desired attributes is no easy task. You'd probably have to have some custom made. And the list of difficulties goes on.

To make a spur gear reduction box, I think it is a very educational and rewarding project. However, spur gears aren't cheap, and dewalt transmissions are. Also, a great deal of weight reduction machining must be done.
I don't necessarily agree or disagree. Yes, an "off the shelf" would make things much easier, but is this the best solution to the problem at hand? (We don't even know what we need to do yet, for pete's sake!)

I'm just playing devil's advocate.
Reply With Quote