Thread: AMD or Intel?
View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-12-2005, 00:07
DarkJedi613's Avatar
DarkJedi613 DarkJedi613 is offline
Running Riot
AKA: Patrick Cloke
FRC #0358 (Hauppauge Robotic Eagles) FRC #1493 (RPI/Albany High School)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Hauppauge, N.Y.
Posts: 455
DarkJedi613 is a splendid one to beholdDarkJedi613 is a splendid one to beholdDarkJedi613 is a splendid one to beholdDarkJedi613 is a splendid one to beholdDarkJedi613 is a splendid one to beholdDarkJedi613 is a splendid one to beholdDarkJedi613 is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to DarkJedi613 Send a message via MSN to DarkJedi613 Send a message via Yahoo to DarkJedi613
Re: AMD or Intel?

Definitly go with the AMD. As said before you can't just look at the overall speed. AMDs are more expensive, however, which is what the lawsuit is about (indirectly). AMD is saying that Pentium has a monopoly on the market and companies are not giving consumers a chance to choose whether they want to use AMD or Intel.

I agree the dual core is a little over board. I recently bought a Athlon 64 2800+ and it runs everything perfectly - and stays rather cool too (37 deg. Celsius).

Also the companies don't have the same chips - the architecture is very different. Ever notice that Intel usually comes out w/ new technology first? That's cause they just add on to their existing chips. AMD tends to start new projects from scratch, totally redesigning their architecture - creating a simpler, more efficent chip which helps it run "better" even though its slower.

And yes I know my opinion is mixed in there. I'd go with a AMD Athlon 64 (but not the x2 unless you're doing high end "professional" stuff).
__________________
2003 - 2006 President, Coach, Webmaster Team358.org
2008 Mentor, Team 1493

Team Search | (Updated: 1-16-08)

FIRSTsearch
Reply With Quote