Thread: [wiki]: More restrictive edit policies?
View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-12-2005, 21:36
Astronouth7303's Avatar
Astronouth7303 Astronouth7303 is offline
Why did I come back?
AKA: Jamie Bliss
FRC #4967 (That ONE Team)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 2,071
Astronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud of
Exclamation [wiki]: More restrictive edit policies?
In light of the recent spam attacks (some 14 seperate IPs in my check tonight), I am wondering if we should enact more restrictive edit policies.

Frankly, I must go through the entire recent changes daily in order to ensure that there is no spam. And I am giing out some pretty harsh blocks for it (after several weeks worth of reverting, you would too). Tonight's lucky number was 1440 (Warriors).

Should we require logging in? Capchas? Spam blacklist?

I would at the very least appreciate help in this battle.
Reply With Quote