View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2006, 16:38
Mike's Avatar
Mike Mike is offline
has common ground with Matt Krass
AKA: Mike Sorrenti
FRC #0237 (Sie-H2O-Bots (See-Hoe-Bots) [T.R.I.B.E.])
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Watertown, CT
Posts: 1,003
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Re: microcontroller for rocket.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug G
Just to help clarify Salik's post...

Team America Rocketry Challenge is the contest we've registered for, which requires a rocket, no more than 1.5 kg, to loft one egg to 800 ft and return it safely in a total elapsed time of 45 seconds.

Yes, many teams simply design their rocket around a certain size and motor and then ballast it to get it to the right altitude. We do have RockSim as well as a computer model done by scratch using Excel, engine thrust data, and our physical rocket characteristics (mass, drag coefficient, etc..).

But in an attempt to be a little more "high-tech", the students wish to add on-board controller to monitor altitude (barometric pressure) and then activate a servo to release a "spring loaded" nose cone and a parachute as well. In this case the engine would not include the ejection charge or delay - an option they have because they're using a reloadable motor system (Aerotech)

There are commercial altimeters available for model rockets - but they're meant to trigger (relay?) a black powder charge to "blow-out" the nose cone and/or drone chute. The rules of the contest do not allow for separate ejection charges. Which is why they are trying to design their own "altimeter" and non-pryotechnic ejection system.

I suspect if they cannot get their "altimeter" to work, they will just use a standard engine with a normal ejection charge as a fall back approach.

Unfortunately I have very limited knowledge of circuits and programming, but Salik is very familiar with programming the FIRST/IFI/Microchip Robot Controller.

The best type of controller (and possibly programmer) to use is what our team needs help with. We appreciate the help and welcome more ideas or comments.
Hmm, so it looks to me you don't really need to ever use the altitude, you just want to eject at altitude X. I would look for a sensor that can be set to either allow current to flow, or current to not flow, at a preset height. That would make it much simpler and cheaper. KISS.

But, yeah, I don't know if those types of sensors exist.
__________________
http://www.mikesorrenti.com/