View Single Post
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2006, 10:02
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: New Rules for 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winged Globe
You might want to see R39 from last year, which reads exactly the same. I believe it regards the use of, for example, two exide batteries on the robot rather than the possession of 10 batteries to farm. No changes.
You know, I was wondering the same thing, but didn't check last year's book (it was nearly 3 a.m. ).

But now that I RTFM, specifically <R51> which is the rule we all know and love, I think we're OK. I still maintain, however, that they should phrase <R44> differently, just because the words "in addition to those provided in the kit" could be easily interpreted as including identical COTS spares (<R51> notwithstanding, of course). Why not merely say "Batteries different from those provided in the kit"? Let the spares rules and <R51> handle the rest (since <R51> specifies the quantity limit of one at a time, as opposed to motors, where, apart from <R43> and the CIMs, the quantity limit is the number of motors from the kit, as properly specified in <R44>).

Sorry for the (minor) mess. I should have known better. I only got as far as <R46> last night, before getting some sleep.

Last edited by Tristan Lall : 08-01-2006 at 10:19. Reason: More words