View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2006, 12:08
Danny Diaz's Avatar
Danny Diaz Danny Diaz is offline
Smooth Operator
AKA: FrankenMentor
None #0418
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 545
Danny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Danny Diaz
Re: Important note about USB-6009 input voltage limitations

The hardware engineers that designed the NI USB-6009 tell me there's already a small bit of protection in the 6009. To supplement this protection, they recommend the circuit I have attached - really it's just a matter of placing 2 diodes on each input, in the orientation specified (just make sure the Vcc for the circuit is the 12V power rail of the robot, NOT of the DAQ device). This allows a surge to drain into the power rail, where you'd most likely just momentarily charge the battery with the power surge. The Victor probably already has this type of protection, so placing the DAQ device inputs closer to the Victor will help if you're just super concerned.

For the diodes, just sizing the diode for the steady-state current of the motor should be sufficient.

Realize this does not work well if you're using a switched power supply, only a battery (thanks to the impedence of the battery!).

-Danny
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	protection.JPG
Views:	99
Size:	17.0 KB
ID:	3791  
__________________
Danny Diaz
Former Lead Technical Mentor, FRC 418
Reply With Quote