View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2006, 13:36
Matt Adams's Avatar
Matt Adams Matt Adams is offline
b(o_o)d
FRC #1525 (Warbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Arlington Hts. IL
Posts: 375
Matt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Matt Adams
Post Re: omni drive vs tank

Quote:
Originally Posted by dude__hi
For the second consecutive year we've decided to use omnis in the front and traction in the back but the omnis are run on the same chain as the traction so we get some power with them.
Cristian, thanks for contributing to this thread. However, I think that this statement isn't quite true. However, you're not the only one who has made this sort of statement before, so don't feel too bad!

The amount of linear force that a wheel provides isn't completely related to the chain tension that is spinning the wheel, as John mentioned before, it's really related to the coefficient of friction (how sticky the wheel is) between the wheel and carpet.

If you take a step back and imagine that your front omni wheels are actually made of a material that really slips on the carpet, they won't be contributing the pushing force your robot can produce. As the chain pulls on the sprocket that turns the wheel, the traction heavy wheels in the back will be biting in to the carpet, while the front will basically be slipping. Basically, you take the coefficient of friction times the weight on each wheel to get how much force your robot can push with.

Hope this helps clarify!

Matt