View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-01-2006, 12:30
Dave Flowerday Dave Flowerday is offline
Software Engineer
VRC #0111 (Wildstang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: North Barrington, IL
Posts: 1,366
Dave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ramming and Hitting

Quote:
Originally Posted by KenWittlief
therefore you could not intentionally 'program' your robot to ram someone elses bot with the intention of causing damage (normally).
Sure you can, and it has been done before. In 2003 there were a few teams who had autonomous programs that shot under the bar with hopes of ramming a slow or non-moving robot from the opposing alliance. I won't speculate as to whether damage was intended but the ramming certainly was. This year you could program your robot to drive straight across the field at full speed with hopes of running into an opponent that did not have autonomous (and therefore would be sitting still on the other end of the field).

Of course there's the possibility of accidental collisions (possibly violent) because you don't know where the other guy is going, and this should not be penalized. However, if it is apparent that a robot's autonomous was designed with the intention of running into another robot then the rule should apply (and that was what was communicated in the past). A robot that drives around aimlessly on the field at high speed with no intention of scoring might be an example of this.