View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2006, 11:13
BillCloyes's Avatar
BillCloyes BillCloyes is offline
Registered User
#0677 (The WireStrippers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 37
BillCloyes has a spectacular aura aboutBillCloyes has a spectacular aura aboutBillCloyes has a spectacular aura about
Re: Bumpers & the Ramp

It seems to me that for teams with a limited design/machine capability, will just abandon bumbers that interfere with them climbing the platform ramp.

The use of basic Kit chassis/DT (depending on wheel size selection or addition of a special mechanism) almost rules out the use of bumbers in the front and rear (relative to robot movement) in order to hav any real chance of climbing the ramp.

I believe this will result in the overall bumber allowance being both less used and less useful than FIRST hopes.

Teams won't use front/rear bumbers if it impeides their robot on the ramp.

Sadly, it is those specific front/rear sides that will be used when their robot "contacts" other robots.

IMHO, I feel that FIRST should permit an exception to <R35> during the climbing of the platform (similar to <R13> beign the exception to <R8>). That being said, this would be at teams own risk, at the platforms will be a likely location of "contact"

-Bill