[Billfred]

And, a resolution to the shipping-the-robot-controller dealio (with a hint of explanation of FIRST's logic):

Q: While the RC is decidedly part of the robot, it is also required to download the programming that the rule is intended to allow. Since much of the software being used this season is too large for past years' controllers, the only way that comes to mind to have an RC to work on during the fix-it windows is to order a second RC, currently listed as "Call for availability" on IFI's website, for $450.

Additionally, IFI regards the RC as part of the FRC Control System (source: http://www.ifirobotics.com/frc-robo...-overview.shtml )

That said, would a naked, nothing-attached, just-as-you-first-saw-it-on-January-7 RC be permissible? If not, is there an alternative I've missed?

A: draft answer:

The IFI Robot Controller is considered part of the robot, and must be shipped with the robot prior to the shipping deadline.

The Fix-It-Windows are intended to permit teams to manufacture spare and replacement parts and develop software for their robot while at their home facility. Teams do not have direct access to the robot during these periods, and must rely on information they have generated during the design and build process to determine the fit and function of any parts developed during the Fix-It-Windows. In other words, documentation matters! This is true for both hardware and software.

There's still that imbalance of folks who can and can't purchase a second RC, but I guess we'll have to go back to the old saying that FIRST isn't fair.