View Single Post
  #79   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-02-2006, 15:47
Peter Matteson's Avatar
Peter Matteson Peter Matteson is offline
Ambitious but rubbish!
FRC #0177 (Bobcat Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,653
Peter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond reputePeter Matteson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: New rule Clarification changes plans

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeepWater
For the record, each of the 4 Q&A answers that I cited were specifically rulled on based on <R04> NOT <S03>. They become a wedge regardless of wheather or not they are a shooter.
Agreed I was just trying to make a point that they also violate the <S03> shooter rule even though it was not brought up.

To comment on how this thread started. The confusion many teams like my own had with the shooter rule is that in the original version of the rule the word throw was used so we believed rolling the ball would be legal. We and several other teams who manipulated small balls in 2004 used a mechanism that was similar to what we wanted to do this year. Based on previous experience we thought this would be legal and therefore when the Q&A started giving responses counter to these items we were compelled to ask a direct question citing a specific example of what we thougt would be allowed. We were wrong and forced to redesign.
Reply With Quote