View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-02-2006, 12:52
Ben Piecuch Ben Piecuch is offline
Bengineer
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 336
Ben Piecuch has a reputation beyond reputeBen Piecuch has a reputation beyond reputeBen Piecuch has a reputation beyond reputeBen Piecuch has a reputation beyond reputeBen Piecuch has a reputation beyond reputeBen Piecuch has a reputation beyond reputeBen Piecuch has a reputation beyond reputeBen Piecuch has a reputation beyond reputeBen Piecuch has a reputation beyond reputeBen Piecuch has a reputation beyond reputeBen Piecuch has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The perfect gearbox

While I like the 2:1 or 2.5:1 ratios that most gearboxes provide, I REALLY like the 3-speed ratios that the Dewalt's provide. Using the CIM, it provides 3:1, 4:1 and 12:1 ratios, and only requires the use of one motor. The "stump puller" ratio, as I like to call it, gives plenty of torque with a one motor setup. (Granted, at the sacrifice of a bit of speed.) While the other two ratios provide plenty of speed to get across a wide open field, a la this 2006 game...

Overall, the planetary setups provide the smallest, lightest packages possible. Let's face it, 3/8" face, 50 tooth gears are never going to be the lightest for a FIRST robot. Look at the success of the Banebot's gearboxes this year. Cheap, light, small, and a lot of people are using them, even though their quality may be a bit questionable... Make a similar gearbox for a drivetrain (with a bit more robustness) and I think you've got a winner.

My only gripe about most gearboxes is that they take up a lot of volume. Specifically, they tend to be quite wide. Folks using an off-the-shelf gearbox for their onmi-drive setups, or even just a standard 4wd find that the overall length of the motor + gearbox setup becomes very long. Andy Brockway and the 229 crew have solved this problem nicely with their gearboxes. Maybe something like that can be integrated into a planetary setup.

Also, if you look at Wildstang's, Simbots, or even Beatty's (and I'm sure others') custom drive gearboxes on all their swerve setups, you'll find a beautiful, lightweight package. Let's see the whitepapers on those bad-boys!

I believe the kit gearbox is brilliant, and why some under funded, under manned teams shy away from it is beyond my grasp. It's a tough package to beat for reliability and ease of use. You need to match it's performance and ease of use if you want to sell into this group.

Though, overall, I think a lot of work can be done to help teams integrate their motors into a nice, off-the-shelf gearbox. The motor rpm's this year are either really fast, or really slow, and teams are finding that it's tough to get something running in the 500 to 1000rpm range with a small, light package. Adapter plates, mounting brackets, etc... take the pain away from teams with just a drill press and a hack saw.

I know this got a little off-topic, but I think making things easier for the smaller teams will greatly increase the competitiveness of all the robots. If you can make it easier, AND add a performance increase (through a shifting transmission or whatnot) you'll find yourself with a winning package.

BEN