View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-02-2006, 18:30
Tom Bottiglieri Tom Bottiglieri is offline
Registered User
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,186
Tom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Wide aspect vs Narrow aspect

Quote:
Originally Posted by VanMan
After looking at all the pictures in the picture gallery, I noticed that most of the robots, or at least more than I had expected, are narrow aspect(the front is the shorter than the side of the robot, I don't know if other teams use this terminology). Our robot is wide aspect and can pick up balls along almost the entire front. Also, it can turn more easily than any of our narrow aspect robots; which seems like a big deal for trying to collect balls off the floor. So, why narrow aspect? Are there some benefits that I am over looking?
I was thinking about the same thing today. I guess the answer is people don't even think of building a wide aspect robot, or are fine with the setup they have been using for years.

Having a narrow robot will make it easier to keep the COG of the robot over its supporting structure as it climbs the ramp, therefore reducing the risk of tipping.
Reply With Quote