Thread: Hopper Capacity
View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-02-2006, 12:45
Elgin Clock's Avatar
Elgin Clock Elgin Clock is offline
updates this status less than FB!
AKA: the one who "will break into your thoughts..."
FRC #0237 (Black Magic)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: H20-Town, Connecticut
Posts: 7,773
Elgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond reputeElgin Clock has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Elgin Clock
Re: Hopper Capacity
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene F
Yes! it is possible. The ball is about 7 inches. A cube that would hold the ball would have a volume of 7^3 or 343 cubic inches. The volume allowed for the robot is 60X60X60 inches. That is 216000 cubic inches. 343 into 216000 is just over 629. If the robot didn't expand the volume would be 64904 cubic inches. Divide that by 343 and you get 189. Collecting all the balls would still leave about half the volume for other robot parts!

Brought to you by a member of team 343 (7^3).
Actually.. well.. yeah.. sure... You may be right. I fit 149 in this configuration here - Minus gravity of course.

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&postcount=101

Oh, and as far as my stance on this thread in general, Hoppers are way overrated for the simple fact that they have potential for jamming.
__________________
The influence of many leads to the individuality of one. - E.C.C. (That's me!!)

Last edited by Elgin Clock : 28-02-2006 at 12:48.
Reply With Quote