Thread: Is FIRST's data right?
View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-03-2006, 23:34
soap108's Avatar
soap108 soap108 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0108 (SigmaC@T)
Team Role: Engineer
  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: Plantation, FL
Posts: 511
soap108 is a splendid one to beholdsoap108 is a splendid one to beholdsoap108 is a splendid one to beholdsoap108 is a splendid one to beholdsoap108 is a splendid one to beholdsoap108 is a splendid one to beholdsoap108 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Is FIRST's data right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wetzel
The match results and awards from VCU are correct. I entered the awards and we checked the match results as they posted. The ranking issue is a known and being worked on, but the QP and RP data are correct, we spot checked multiple teams.

Wetzel
I entered the data of VCU and get the same rankings. A couple times I had to reverse engineer the score, especially match #8 where the red alliance had 12 minus 35, not 0 minus 35 as the overlay had shown.
Also, match 53 was shown as 48-19, but the website states 53-29.
While I have the same ranking order, a few teams have different Ave RP than first does.

It would really help if the first website included 1) penalty / dq info 2) "extra match" / surrogate info 3) hi score 4) coinflip result.

When it comes to "Hi Score"... Is it the highest un-penalized or penalized score? It seems it can not be the highest Ranking Point score, since teams like 1731 are listed at 99.

Also, If 1731 had been DQ in that 99 pt match, would their Hi Score have been the next highest, 76 in match 1? ... would make sense, right?

Thanks,
KA-108